Friday, July 01, 2005

THE APOCALYPSE IS UPON US

Yes the day that all progressive, caring, intelligent human beings in Australia have been dreading is upon us. Today is the day Howard and his SS cadre gain control of the senate. The attack on anybody who is not a money-grubbing fascist begins.

So why are we in Australia in this mess? Well obviously because people voted for Howard.

But why did people vote for that evil dip-shit? Most people who know anything about politics would say the issue of interest rates; the government ran a scare campaign stating that if you voted for the ALP interest rates would go up.

So why was this an issue? Because house prices have risen so dramatically.

Why have they risen so dramatically? Well, we have the ALP to blame for this. Two sets of two words; Negative gearing, and Tax cuts.

Negative gearing is a scheme that allows people with "excess cash" (obviously this rules out anybody who works an honest, decent job) to invest in property and offset any losses they may suffer as a result by reducing their taxable income. Or some such evil shit. Now when they were in power the ALP actually got rid of negative gearing for a while. That is until the multi-millionares who pass money under the table to them told them to bring it back . Which they did.

Now when in power the ALP also dramatically cut taxes for high income earners, and also dramatically cut the company tax rate. This meant that the bourgeoisie, wine drinking fascist fucks had more excess cash to throw around and invest. And property seemed like a good option; it gives you a tangible asset, it rarely loses value, it tends to steadily increase in value, and at times it dramatically increases in value.

Thus you had all these yuppie fucks looking to buy property. As a result of this increase in demand, because we live in a market economy, house prices increased, and increased and increased. When the Libs came into power they further cut taxes for high income earners, further exaberbating the problem, so that your average person looking to buy a house needed to borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars from the bank. As a result these people have huge mortagage repayments to make each week/month. Thus if interest rates go up by even a small amount, so does their mortgage repayments. Thus the reason why interest rates were a huge issue.

Sure the ALP could have tried to counter this nonsensical arguement that interest rates under them would increase, but they had more important things to do, like making sure the heathens didn't get votes.

What do you mean, you may be asking. Well what I am refering to is the ALP's forestry policy in Tasmania launched a week before the election. Like most things with the ALP, it was half-arsed, not going far enough to protect the Tasmanian forests. It also would not gain them any votes on a two party preferred basis. People who want to protect the forests will vote green, and in almost all cases give their preferences to the ALP.

So why do it? Well the reality is that the ALP is not a left of centre party; the party is run by the right, and the NSW Catholic right is very powerful in the party. That's not to say that there aren't some decent peple in the ALP; they just don't influence policy.

Now the ALP right, and particularly the NSW Catholic RIght are very socially conservative; they hate gays and are opposed to gay marriages, and want to restrict abortions. As such the Greens are immoral and unchristian to them. They are thus the enemy, and as such they wanted to stop them from getting votes.

That's when they hit upon the idea, "Hey, let's adopt a half-arsed policy that gives the impression we care about saving Tasmania's rainforests, so that environmentalists will vote for us and not those satanic Greens, who if they get enough seats in parliament will try and legalise human sacrifices to satan." Thus the scenes of Mark Latham launching the policy a week before the election.

Except most environmentalists are smart and didn't buy the ALP's nonsense. However the half arsed policy was enough to piss off some people in Tasmania. The result was that people who would traditionally vote for the ALP in Tasmania voted for the Liberals. Thus a senate seat In Tasmania that the ALP should have held, they lost to the Liberals, helping to deliver the coalition a senate majority, and putting the Australian people in the shit they are now in.

The fucking ALP. A bunch of fucking useless rednecks.

4 Comments:

Blogger Melba said...

aleks, there are two types of people in the world as i see it. the people who see small, and the people who see big. small people are ones who care only about what falls between them and their shadows. what their wages are, whether they can pay their mortgage, buy a house, afford this or that.

then there are the big picture people. people who care about OTHERS and society.

there is a lot of polemic and vitriol around on blogger [not here, and not close but elsewhere] that makes me sad about where everything is headed.

you are right about howard. he was voted in. but no one puts up their hand and says i voted for that fuck. all you hear are the voices of people who DIDN'T vote for him -i can't believe i have friends who may have voted for him. and i suspect my boyfriend did. have never asked him directly because i thought then i'd have to break up with him. no only kidding, i'm too old for such radical protest!

12:43 am

 
Blogger Aleks - Anarcho-Syndicalist said...

Hey, I refuse to go out with woman if they aren;t to my political liking. Or is it they refuse to go out with me because I am too much of a political extremist?

12:57 pm

 
Blogger Cape Man said...

Hey, I agree with your analysis on the ALP and Greens deal which pretty much scared Tasmania into the arms of the Liberals.
I mentioned this to MG once that because of Pauline Hanson, the Libs went way right to chase the real rednecks in QLD/NSW and the ALP went with them in order to try to pick up some scraps. It hasn't worked and now left a void in the far left which might be wholly the domain of the Greens. My concern with the greens is that it's all very well to save forests, but an economy does not run on eco-tourism alone, get my drift. They need to prove that they have an idea on running an economy, I have no idea how they propose to do that. Someone needs to be creative and think outside the square. The Greens are socially responsible and caring but I'd say the majority of white australia are not, so there is no connection (most 1st generation ethnics, eg my folks, would not know how to spell Greens).
As for me, my vote went left of center, but via the democrats (yes I know) but in my seat Jenny Macklin had a huge majority so it didn't really matter.

So MG, maybe you should have asked your boyfriend. You might have been pleasantly surprised.
He might be a bit more willing to engage when things are out in the open. Give him a chance.

PS: Where the hell does Hillsong fit in?

2:15 pm

 
Blogger Aleks - Anarcho-Syndicalist said...

Cape Man, you should give the Greens a bit more credit. They do have comprehensive policies, many of which are similar to what the Scandanavian Social Democracies had.

In terms of 1st generation ethnics not voting for the Greens, this is starting to change. On election day I was handing out flyers for the Greens, and a number of people who appeared to be first generation Australian (as indicated by their accents) took only Greens flyers.

As for Hillsong, this was an issue we were discussing at work yesterday (I love working in such a left wing workplace). They are the Australian equivalent of the US evangelical movement that believes "God wants you to make a lot of money, even if it means exploiting others." Why they have become popular is that the current growing inequalities in our country mean that there a growing number of people who try to reconcile their Christian upbringing with their current greed.

4:50 pm

 

Post a Comment

<< Home